[Intelforum] Secrecy News -- 11/03/11

IntelForum Mailing List intelforum at lists101.his.com
Thu Nov 3 10:02:10 EDT 2011


Format Note:  If you cannot easily read the text below, or you prefer to
receive Secrecy News in another format, please reply to this email to let
us know.

SECRECY NEWS
from the FAS Project on Government Secrecy
Volume 2011, Issue No. 103
November 3, 2011

Secrecy News Blog:  http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/


**     HELP SUPPORT SECRECY NEWS
**     SOME CORRECTIONS ON INTELLIGENCE BUDGET SECRECY


HELP SUPPORT SECRECY NEWS

We invite you to help sustain Secrecy News and the work of the FAS Project
on Government Secrecy by making a tax-deductible contribution to the
Federation of American Scientists.

	http://www.fas.org/member/donate_today.html

Last week, the Congressional Research Service issued a report about "The
Arsenal Act," a peculiar and little-known law dating back to 1854 that
authorizes the Secretary of the Army to "abolish any United States arsenal
that he considers unnecessary." If you wanted to read that report you could
purchase a copy for $29.95 from a commercial vendor.  Or you could write to
your Congressman to request that a copy be sent to you.  Or you could
simply read the report right now for free on the Federation of American
Scientists web site.

	http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R42062.pdf

We do not charge anyone for access to this or thousands of other valuable,
hard-to-find government records that are highlighted in nearly every issue
of Secrecy News.  The whole point of our work is to make such records more
easily available.

But we do incur costs in gathering and publishing the records.  We also
invest time and resources in probing the boundaries of the national
security secrecy system and reporting our findings to the interested
public.  We engage in advocacy to promote a real, measurable reduction in
the scope of secrecy through the Fundamental Classification Guidance Review
and other mechanisms.  And we assist reporters and researchers dealing with
questions of access to government information.

If you derive any benefit from these activities, please help us to
maintain and expand them. Donations can be made online here (specify that
your donation should be directed to "government secrecy"):

	http://www.fas.org/member/donate_today.html

If contributing via Paypal, send us a separate email to let us know you
want your contribution allocated to the FAS Project on Government Secrecy. 
Checks payable to FAS may also be mailed to:

   Secrecy News
   Federation of American Scientists
   1725 DeSales Street N.W.
   6th Floor
   Washington D.C. 20036


SOME CORRECTIONS ON INTELLIGENCE BUDGET SECRECY

Earlier this week, we noted that it was increasingly unlikely that the
budget for the National Intelligence Program (NIP) would be removed from
concealment in the Defense Department budget and given its own budget line
item, as the Director of National Intelligence and others had proposed.

	http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2011/11/prospects_fade.html

Instead, the status quo is likely to persist, we wrote, because "Congress
likes it that way."  But this remark was too glib.  The language we cited
from the House version of the Defense Appropriations Act that would
prohibit NIP separation has not been adopted in the Senate.  Influential
members of the Senate Intelligence Committee actually favor a separate NIP
budget as a way to increase transparency and to provide the DNI with
greater control of appropriated funds.  So Congress is not of one mind on
this question, and it has not completed action on the prohibition proposed
in the House.

We also mistakenly credited the DNI with "voluntarily" disclosing the
amount of the FY2012 NIP budget request in February of this year.  But in
fact, that disclosure was not voluntary.  It was mandated by Congress in
the FY2010 Intelligence Authorization Act (section 364).

	http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/2010_cr/house-fy10auth.html

While disclosure of the budget request for the National Intelligence
Program is required by law, the disclosure of the budget request for the
Military Intelligence Program (MIP) is not specifically required.  Secrecy
News asked the Pentagon to disclose it anyway.  Officials said a response
to that request would be forthcoming "sometime around January 1, 2012."


_______________________________________________
Secrecy News is written by Steven Aftergood and published by the
Federation of American Scientists.

The Secrecy News Blog is at:
     http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/

To SUBSCRIBE to Secrecy News, go to:
     http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/secrecy/subscribe.html

To UNSUBSCRIBE, go to
     http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/secrecy/unsubscribe.html

OR email your request to saftergood at fas.org

Secrecy News is archived at:
     http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/secrecy/index.html

Support the FAS Project on Government Secrecy with a donation:
     http://www.fas.org/member/donate_today.html


_______________________
Steven Aftergood
Project on Government Secrecy
Federation of American Scientists
web:    www.fas.org/sgp/index.html
email:  saftergood at fas.org
voice:  (202) 454-4691
twitter: @saftergood





More information about the IntelForum mailing list