[Intelforum] Secrecy News -- 04/01/10
IntelForum Mailing List
intelforum at lists101.his.com
Thu Apr 1 21:18:50 EDT 2010
Format Note: If you cannot easily read the text below, or you prefer to
receive Secrecy News in another format, please reply to this email to let
us know.
SECRECY NEWS
from the FAS Project on Government Secrecy
Volume 2010, Issue No. 26
April 1, 2010
Secrecy News Blog: http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/
** WARRANTLESS SURVEILLANCE OF CHARITY RULED UNLAWFUL
** BIOTERRORISM, CHANGES IN THE ARCTIC, AND MORE FROM CRS
WARRANTLESS SURVEILLANCE OF CHARITY RULED UNLAWFUL
Warrantless surveillance of an Islamic charity in Oregon in 2004 violated
the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), a court ruled on March
31.
http://www.fas.org/sgp/jud/statesec/ahif033110.pdf
In the culmination of a four-year lawsuit, Judge Vaughn Walker of the
Northern District of Columbia found that the government had unlawfully
intercepted international telephone conversations of the Al-Haramain
Islamic Foundation without a warrant, as required by the FISA for
intelligence and counterterrorism surveillance. The government had
contended that the state secrets privilege barred a resolution of the
case, but the court found that the defendants were able to make their case
without the use of state secrets.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/01/us/01nsa.html
At least by implication, the ruling means that aspects of President Bush's
Terrorist Surveillance Program were illegal. Significantly, that
determination was made by a court, based on a private complaint years
after the fact, and not through congressional intelligence oversight.
While Congress did enact the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of
1978, which was the foundation of the court's ruling, contemporary
congressional oversight alone would have left the Al-Haramain violation
(and untold others) undiscovered and unpunished.
The new ruling also leaves the state secrets privilege seemingly tarnished
and in disrepute. "The Government does not rely on an assertion of the
[state secrets privilege] to coverup alleged unlawful conduct," government
attorneys told the court. But had the Bush and Obama Administrations' use
of the privilege prevailed, that is exactly what would have happened--
conduct that has now been found illegal would have been covered up. To
the extent that there is a legitimate role for a state secrets privilege,
the government might now be motivated to bolster the legitimacy of the
privilege, perhaps through enactment of the pending State Secrets
Protection Act. That bill would, among other things, provide for judicial
review and validation of the substance of assertedly privileged evidence.
http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/2008_cr/statesec.html
Finally, the ruling casts new light retrospectively on the December 2005
New York Times story that exposed the Bush Administration's warrantless
surveillance program. A cogent case has been made by Gabriel Schoenfeld
(in Commentary Magazine, March 2006, and in his forthcoming book Necessary
Secrets) that the Times story violated a statute (18 USC 798) that clearly
prohibits unauthorized disclosure and publication of classified
communications intelligence information. But it was the Times story that
set the stage for the Al-Haramain lawsuit. With a conclusive judicial
ruling that the reported surveillance was in significant respects
unlawful, the Times' revelation of the classified surveillance program may
more readily be seen as supporting and enabling the rule of law, not
defying it.
BIOTERRORISM, CHANGES IN THE ARCTIC, AND MORE FROM CRS
New Congressional Research Service reports obtained by Secrecy News that
have not been made readily available to the public include the following:
"Federal Efforts to Address the Threat of Bioterrorism: Selected Issues
for Congress," March 18, 2010:
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/terror/R41123.pdf
"Changes in the Arctic: Background and Issues for Congress," March 30,
2010:
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41153.pdf
"Deforestation and Climate Change," March 24, 2010:
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41144.pdf
"The Impact of Major Legislation on Budget Deficits: 2001 to 2009," March
23, 2010:
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41134.pdf
"GAO Bid Protests: An Overview of Timeframes and Procedures," March 15,
2010:
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R40228.pdf
"GAO Bid Protests: Trends, Analysis, and Options for Congress," February
11, 2009:
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R40227.pdf
"The Future of U.S. Trade Policy: An Analysis of Issues and Options for
the 111th Congress," March 24, 2010:
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R41145.pdf
"Europe's Preferential Trade Agreements: Status, Content, and
Implications," March 22, 2010:
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R41143.pdf
"F-35 Alternate Engine Program: Background and Issues for Congress," March
22, 2010:
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/weapons/R41131.pdf
"Cyprus: Reunification Proving Elusive," April 1, 2010:
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R41136.pdf
A bill on government transparency that was introduced by Rep. Mike Quigley
(D-IL) last week would finally make all non-confidential CRS reports
publicly available online. There must have been a dozen such proposals
that have been introduced in Congress over the last 15 years without
effect, and it is not clear whether the latest iteration will fare any
better.
http://www.fas.org/sgp/congress/2010/hr4983.html
_______________________________________________
Secrecy News is written by Steven Aftergood and published by the
Federation of American Scientists.
The Secrecy News Blog is at:
http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/
To SUBSCRIBE to Secrecy News, go to:
http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/secrecy/subscribe.html
To UNSUBSCRIBE, go to
http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/secrecy/unsubscribe.html
OR email your request to saftergood at fas.org
Secrecy News is archived at:
http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/secrecy/index.html
Support the FAS Project on Government Secrecy with a donation:
http://www.fas.org/member/donate_today.html
_______________________
Steven Aftergood
Project on Government Secrecy
Federation of American Scientists
web: www.fas.org/sgp/index.html
email: saftergood at fas.org
voice: (202) 454-4691
More information about the IntelForum
mailing list