[Intelforum] Secrecy News -- 02/12/09

IntelForum Mailing List intelforum at lists101.his.com
Thu Feb 12 10:38:56 EST 2009


Format Note:  If you cannot easily read the text below, or you prefer to
receive Secrecy News in another format, please reply to this email to let
us know.

SECRECY NEWS
from the FAS Project on Government Secrecy
Volume 2009, Issue No. 14
February 12, 2009

Secrecy News Blog:  http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/

Support Secrecy News
http://www.fas.org/sgp/donate.html


**	MANAGEMENT CRISIS THREATENS "FOREIGN RELATIONS" SERIES
**	OPEN SOURCE CENTER VIEWS IRAQI ELECTIONS
**	IRAN'S ECONOMIC CONDITIONS, AND MORE FROM CRS


MANAGEMENT CRISIS THREATENS "FOREIGN RELATIONS" SERIES

A management crisis in the State Department Office of the Historian
threatens the future of the official "Foreign Relations of the United
States" (FRUS) series that documents the history of U.S. foreign policy,
according to a newly disclosed report on the situation.

"We find that the current working atmosphere in the HO [Historian's
Office] and between the HO and the HAC [Historical Advisory Committee]
poses real threats to the high scholarly quality of the FRUS series and
the benefits it brings," the January 13, 2009 report to the Secretary of
State said.  A copy of the report was obtained by Secrecy News.

	http://www.fas.org/sgp/advisory/state/ho-review.pdf

The report was commissioned in December by then-Secretary Condoleezza Rice
following the dramatic resignation of the chairman of the State Department
Historical Advisory Committee Prof. W. Roger Louis as well as escalating
complaints from fellow HAC members, staff, colleagues, and others.  (See
"State Dept: Crisis in the 'Foreign Relations' Series," Secrecy News,
December 11, 2008.)

At first glance, the new report is rather anticlimactic.  It does not even
mention the name of the State Department Historian, Dr. Marc J. Susser, who
has been the focus of the complaints regarding mismanagement.  It also does
not explore, much less resolve, any of the specific personnel disputes that
have arisen in the Office.  ("It quickly became apparent that emotions ran
high and that there was a great deal of contradictory testimony," the
report says.  "Reconciling the contradictions seemed both unlikely... and
unproductive.")

But on closer inspection, the report makes at least two crucial points. 
First, it confirms that the crisis is real.  Out of several dozen people
who were interviewed and consulted, "only a single person suggested that
there was no crisis, no problem beyond what is normal in an office."

Second, regardless of who may be to blame, "we believe that effective
management is the responsibility of the managers, not the managed...."  In
other words, the Office leadership, including the Historian himself, has
failed to manage the Office in an appropriate manner.

The review therefore delicately recommends "serious consideration of a
reorganization" of the Office of the Historian.

The nature of such a potential reorganization was not spelled out in the
new report.  Conceivably, it could imply removal of current management, or
rearrangement of existing functions to place the FRUS series under new
authority, or something else.  In the meantime, the search for a new
General Editor of the FRUS series has been suspended pending a decision
about how to proceed.  (The previous General Editor resigned abruptly last
year in a sign of the growing turmoil in the Office.) 

"At this point no decisions have been made as to next steps concerning the
Office of the Historian," State Department spokesman Robert A. Wood told
Secrecy News on February 6.

There are several complicating factors that will impede prompt correction
of the situation.  Bad management is not a firing offense in the U.S.
government.  Even if the Historian has lost the confidence of a sizable
fraction of his colleagues and subordinates, that does not mean he can be
summarily removed.  To the contrary, he has strong civil service
protections as a member of the Senior Executive Service.  By law (5 U.S.C.
3395) he "may not be involuntarily reassigned" within 120 days after the
appointment of a new agency head.  Nor can the significant expertise of
now-departed staff members be quickly reconstituted.  For these reasons,
and because of the myriad other issues involved in restoring the vitality
of the FRUS production process, no short-term resolution of the problem is
in sight.

"The Historical Advisory Committee has long been concerned about two
interrelated issues," said the new HAC chairman Prof. Robert J. McMahon
last week, namely "the obvious morale problems among the staff and an
alarming turnover among experienced FRUS editors. Those two issues, in our
judgment, will inevitably lead to a slowdown in the production of FRUS
volumes and we are concerned that the series is already years away from
coming even close to the legislatively-mandated 30-year deadline."  (By
statute, FRUS is supposed to present a "thorough, accurate, and reliable
documentary record of major United States foreign policy decisions" not
more than 30 years after the events described.)  The next scheduled
meeting of the HAC is March 2-3.

I should mention that I have had some limited, negative interaction with
Dr. Susser, the State Department Historian.  After I wrote something
critical of FRUS and the Historian's Office that he disapproved of, he
removed me from the distribution list for hardcopy volumes of the series. 
This action might have been justified as a cost-cutting measure,
particularly since I am not a professional historian and Secrecy News is
not a public library.  But the punitive aspect of the move was, I thought,
unseemly.  (See "Secrecy News Purged from State Dept History Mailing List,"
Secrecy News, June 12, 2008.)  However, I don't consider that episode to be
part of the current controversy.

It also bears mentioning on this 200th birthday of Abraham Lincoln that
the venerable FRUS series dates back to the Lincoln Administration.


OPEN SOURCE CENTER VIEWS IRAQI ELECTIONS

A recent DNI Open Source Center publication presents a guide to the Iraqi
provincial elections that took place on January 31.  The report was
prepared prior to the elections and does not reflect their important
results, but it does provide an informative overview of the electoral
process, the Iraqi provincial council structure, and the thirty-six
contending coalitions, with valuable individual profiles of the numerous
coalition members.

Like most OSC analyses, it has not been approved for public release, but a
copy was obtained by Secrecy News.   See "Iraq: Provincial Elections Guide
2009," Open Source Center Report, January 21, 2009.

	http://www.fas.org/irp/dni/osc/iraq-elections.pdf

In a recent meeting with the Director of CIA Information Management
Services, we reiterated our view that all unclassified, non-copyrighted
publications of the Open Source Center (which is managed by CIA) should be
made freely available to the public.

"I will convey the message," the Director told us.

The Center for Democracy and Technology and Openthegovernment.org are
inviting members of the public to suggest categories of government
documents that they believe should be easily available online, but are
not.

     http://www.showusthedata.org


IRAN'S ECONOMIC CONDITIONS, AND MORE FROM CRS

Noteworthy new reports from the Congressional Research Service that have
not been made readily available to the public -- despite the widely-noted
publication and republication of other CRS reports by wikileaks.org this
week -- include the following.

"Iran's Economic Conditions: U.S. Policy Issues," updated January 15,
2009:

	http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/mideast/RL34525.pdf

"U.S. Foreign Aid to the Palestinians," updated January 30, 2009:

	http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/mideast/RS22967.pdf

"The Google Library Project: Is Digitization for Purposes of Online
Indexing Fair Use Under Copyright Law?" February 5, 2009:

	http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R40194.pdf

"FEMA's Disaster Declaration Process: A Primer," January 23, 2009:

	http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/homesec/RL34146.pdf

"Nuclear Waste Disposal: Alternatives to Yucca Mountain," February 6,
2009:

	http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/nuke/R40202.pdf



_______________________________________________
Secrecy News is written by Steven Aftergood and published by the
Federation of American Scientists.

The Secrecy News Blog is at:
     http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/

To SUBSCRIBE to Secrecy News, go to:
     http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/secrecy/subscribe.html

To UNSUBSCRIBE, go to
     http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/secrecy/unsubscribe.html

OR email your request to saftergood at fas.org

Secrecy News is archived at:
     http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/secrecy/index.html


_______________________
Steven Aftergood
Project on Government Secrecy
Federation of American Scientists
web:    www.fas.org/sgp/index.html
email:  saftergood at fas.org
voice:  (202) 454-4691




More information about the IntelForum mailing list