[Intelforum] Secrecy News -- 08/04/06 (IF)
IntelForum Mailing List
intelforum at lists101.his.com
Fri Aug 4 14:28:27 EDT 2006
from the FAS Project on Government Secrecy
Volume 2006, Issue No. 87
August 4, 2006
Secrecy News Blog: http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/
Support Secrecy News:
** SEN. BOND'S ANTI-LEAK BILL DRAWS FIRE AT HOME
** INFORMATION OPERATIONS IN IRAQ - WHAT WENT WRONG?
SEN. BOND'S ANTI-LEAK BILL DRAWS FIRE AT HOME
"Sen. Kit Bond has gone way too far in an effort to curtail the
public's right to information on government operations,"
according to one of the leading newspapers in his home state of
The Kansas City Star objected to a bill introduced this week by
Senator Bond that would outlaw "leaks" or unauthorized
disclosures of classified information. A similar provision was
vetoed by President Clinton in 2000.
Opponents of such measures argue that the ability of the press to
uncover and report on misconduct in classified programs often
depends on leaks of classified information, and that reporting
on such leaks serves a larger national interest.
So, for example, the fact that "numerous incidents of sadistic,
blatant, and wanton criminal abuses were inflicted" on detainees
at Abu Ghraib prison was classified "Secret" when it was first
reported by the press. The unauthorized disclosure of these
findings, from a classified report by Army General Antonio
Taguba, triggered a series of investigations and continuing
"Bond should withdraw his proposal immediately," the Kansas City
Star editorialized today. "It obviously is not well thought
See "Law Would Go Against Ideals of Free Society," Kansas City
Star, August 4 (free but intrusive registration required):
"Over the past few years, we have seen unauthorized disclosures
of classified information at an alarming rate," said Senator
Bond on the Senate floor on August 2.
"Each one of the leaks gravely increases the threat to our
national security and makes it easier for our enemies to achieve
their murderous and destructive plans. Each leak is a window of
opportunity for terrorists to discover our sources and methods.
Each violation of trust guarantees chaos and violence in the
See the introduction of his bill to prohibit unauthorized
disclosures as well as the text of the bill (S. 3774) here:
The bill has been referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee.
INFORMATION OPERATIONS IN IRAQ - WHAT WENT WRONG?
Information operations that are designed to influence the
perceptions and conduct of enemy combatants and non-combatants
can be a highly effective adjunct to military force, but they
were not effectively executed by the U.S. military in Iraq, a
new U.S. Army monograph reports.
Information operations can include military deception,
psychological operations, operations security, and electronic
The Army monograph investigates the role of information
operations in Iraq and presents recommendations for changes in
doctrine, training, resources and intelligence support.
See "Information Operations in Operations Enduring Freedom and
Iraqi Freedom -- What Went Wrong?" by Major Joseph L. Cox, US
Army School of Advanced Military Studies, Fort Leavenworth, May
2006 (134 pages, 3.6 MB PDF):
Secrecy News is written by Steven Aftergood and published by the
Federation of American Scientists.
The Secrecy News Blog is at:
To SUBSCRIBE to Secrecy News, send email to
secrecy_news-request at lists.fas.org
with "subscribe" in the body of the message.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a blank email message to
secrecy_news-remove at lists.fas.org
OR email your request to saftergood at fas.org
Secrecy News is archived at:
SUPPORT Secrecy News with a donation here:
Project on Government Secrecy
Federation of American Scientists
email: saftergood at fas.org
voice: (202) 454-4691
More information about the IntelForum