[Intelforum] Bush's Warrantless Wiretaps
George W. Maschke
maschke at antipolygraph.org
Mon Dec 19 12:33:43 EST 2005
At a press conference today, in defending his (in my opinion, clearly
criminal) order to the National Security Agency to conduct warrantless
wiretapping of the overseas communications of U.S. persons, President
George W. Bush has suggested that the whistleblowers who reported this
to the press had undermined national security by giving terrorists
information about intelligence sources and methods. He invoked earlier
press reports that the NSA had been monitoring a phone used by Osama bin
Laden and how this press report had led bin Laden to stop using that phone.
But it is hard to see how the revelation of Bush's decision to order
warrantless wiretapping is in any way comparable. It is no secret that
the U.S. has the technical means to intercept electronic communications,
and that domestically, this has been legally done under the Foreign
Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). How does the revelation that the
NSA has also been illegally monitoring the communications of U.S.
persons in any way aid terrorists?
I think that the whistleblowers who revealed this illegal domestic
surveillance program to the press are to be commended, not condemned.
George W. Maschke
More information about the IntelForum
mailing list