[Intelforum] War crimes

[Damato, Anthony A]

But can Mike Levin be excused for his self-contradictory statement?

Tony D'Amato
http://anthonydamato.law.northwestern.edu/






At 02:00 PM 8/13/2005, you wrote:
>In a message dated 8/13/2005 11:15:29 AM Eastern Daylight Time, 
>intelforum at lists101.his.com writes:
><http://lawofnations.blogspot.com/>http://lawofnations.blogspot.com/
>
>Prof. Anthony D'Amato can be excused for his erroneous "war crimes" 
>conclusion re the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. He appears not 
>to be familiar with the extensive intelligence, kept secret for over 
>thirty years but now declassified and publicly available at the National 
>Archives (in the SRH series), which prove conclusively that the Japanese 
>High Command was not about to surrender, --even after Hiroshima.
>Indeed, it would have been a crime if President Truman had not dropped the 
>bombs and instead had condemned many thousands of Americans and Japanese 
>to perish in a bloody invasion of mainland Japan.
>
>Mike Levin
>_______________________________________________
>IntelForum mailing list
>IntelForum at lists101.his.com
>http://lists101.his.com/mailman/listinfo/intelforum
>-
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists101.his.com/pipermail/intelforum/attachments/20050814/64524fe3/attachment.html