SANDY BURGER

[JBugler at aol.com]

MODERATOR'S Note (Mike Dravis): After this post was submitted for
distribution, the Moderator made edits to the text as indicated by
the use of [brackets].

**********

GOOD PEOPLE.

THE FOLLOWING CLIP APPEARED THIS DAY ON THE EDITORIAL PAGE OF THE WALL ST.
JOURNAL.  IT ADDRESSES THE MISSING DOCUMENTS FROM THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES.  THE
ACCUSED PERPETRATOR IS SANDY "SOCKS" BERGER.  THIS IS NOT A JOKING 
MATTER AS [President Clinton] MAN WOULD HAVE US BELIEVE. THIS IS 
SERIOUS.  PLEASE READ.  IF YOU
FEEL AS THIS WRITER DOES, SUGGEST YOU E. MAIL OR FAX YOUR ELECTIVE
REPRESENTATIVES.  DO NOT BOTHER TO SEND A LETTER. ALL LETTERS GO TO 
HAVANA CUBA TO BE
CHECKED FOR ANTHRAX.

IS THIS NOT WONDERFUL?  FIRST WROTE A LETTER TO A CONGRESSMAN IN 1957.  IT
COST 4 CENTS AND GOT A REPLY IN TEN DAYS.

TODAY EACH AND EVERY LETTER MUST BE EXAMINED FOR ANTHRAX. DELAY IS THREE
MONTHS.

WHAT BETTER WAY TO PREVENT THE PEOPLE FROM REACHING THEIR ELECTIVE
REPRESENTATIVES.  IT IS LIKE GOING BACK TO FRANCE PRIOR TO THE DELUGE.

GOD BLESS.

JOHN W. BUGLER

# # #

We've all had experience with the office Oscar Madison. Yet notwithstanding
Bill Clinton's transparently insincere effort last week to laugh off the
docs-in-socks scandal as a testament to Sandy Berger's sloppy ways -- 
that Sandy! --
the precision with which the former National Security Adviser zeroed in on
one specific document in the National Archives suggests focus, not
absentmindedness.

[Excision]

Intelligence Forum (http://www.intelforum.org) is sponsored by Intelligence
and National Security, a Frank Cass journal (http://www.frankcass.com/jnls/ins.htm)